The highest court in neighboring Massachusetts made a potentially huge statement in one of its most recent cases, ruling that – in light of the police violence against young black men – running away from officers should not weigh heavily in a cop’s determination of whether they have a reasonable suspicion to stop them.
What Happened
The case, Commonwealth v. Warren, started when police responded to a robbery in Boston. The victim reported that someone had taken things out of his bedroom and run away. He described them as three black males, one wearing a red hoodie, one wearing a black one, and the last wearing “dark clothing.” One officer later saw two black men, both in dark clothing. The officer called to them, but they jogged away. Moments later, another officer found the same two, called to them again, and they ran away. Both of the men were pursued and eventually apprehended. A subsequent search of one of the men, Jimmy Warren, revealed evidence of the crime of possessing an unlicensed firearm.
Running Away From Police, and Reasonable Suspicion
In order for police to justifiably stop a suspect and talk with them, the officer needs to have at least a reasonable suspicion that the suspect played a part in a crime, or is about to play a part in a crime.
In Massachusetts, at least, running away from an approaching police officer is one of the factors that gets taken into account as to whether a cop can have a reasonable suspicion about the suspect. The idea is that no one would run away from a police officer if they didn’t have something to hide.
Racial Disparities Gives Black Bystanders a Reason to Run
Jimmy Warren’s case went to trial and then got appealed all the way to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, the highest court in the state. There, the judges noted that, according to the Boston Police Department’s own statistics, black men were being racially profiled and were disproportionately targeted by police for questioning in the Boston area. In light of these facts, the judges decided that it was entirely reasonable for black men to avoid police at all costs, and that fleeing from police was, therefore, “not necessarily probative” of a suspect’s guilt or innocence.
Because the only reason why police pursued Mr. Warren was because he ran away from police, and because the evidence of his firearm violation was only found because of this pursuit, the evidence was thrown out under the exclusionary rule.
Contact The Maine Criminal Defense Group For Help Now
This case presents a huge change in the law of how police are permitted to search, stop, or apprehend suspects, and could be the start to a fascinating new development in the criminal law. It will be interesting to see whether the highest courts of other states will follow the lead of Massachusetts, and whether Massachusetts will stay strong in its decision to rein in police overreaching.
William T. Bly is a criminal defense attorney in the state of Maine, and will be monitoring the developments in wake of this decision closely. Contact his law office online or at (207) 571-8146.
Related Articles
The moment you suspect you’re under investigation or face criminal charges in Maine, your next decision could determine your future. Every conversation with law enforcement, every document you sign, and[...]
After an arrest and criminal charge in Maine, a defendant’s first court appearance may be to apply for bail at the arraignment and bail hearing. The process of securing a[...]
If you are charged with a crime in Maine, going to trial is just one of the possible outcomes. In fact, around 90 percent of criminal cases in Maine are[...]
Defendants in criminal cases typically have four options for resolving their case if the charges are not dismissed: Plea negotiation, where the defendant agrees to plead guilty (or no contest)[...]
Many people are unaware that it is a criminal offense in Maine to make a false report of an emergency that causes public alarm. Even those who are aware of[...]
A criminal conviction usually appears on criminal records for life in Maine, potentially impacting the individual’s employment, education, travel, housing, immigration status, and more. However, certain low-level misdemeanor convictions can[...]
The legal term for sentencing a convicted criminal is not required to serve is called a suspended sentence. A suspended sentence is handed down during the sentencing portion following a[...]
If you receive a traffic ticket in Maine, you may be facing far more than demerit points or an administrative penalty. You could be facing criminal sanctions and a permanent[...]
In Maine, disorderly conduct laws effectively make disturbing the peace a criminal offense. While disorderly conduct is considered one of the least serious offenses under Maine’s Criminal Statutes, it can[...]
Any criminal charge for a drug-related offense is a serious matter in Maine,but how consequential the outcomes can get may depend on whether the charge is filed at the state[...]
